On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > On Jan 14, 2015, at 3:50 AM, Tejas Belagod <tejas.bela...@arm.com> wrote: >> As agreed here (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971), please >> can I reverse Andrew's patch >> out(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02916.html)? > > Ok. > > Unless someone objects to a reversion like this, when the author of a patch > says it should be reverted… that’s all the approval it needs, though, people > can always ask for a review for any reason they want.
And now this reversal needs to be reverted. Because the conditional compare optimization went back in. I figured the optimization would go back in and that is why I did not act on reverting my patch that fast. The conditional compare patch went in a day after this reversal went in ;). Thanks, Andrew
