Hi Gerald,
how about the following variation (which I have not committed yet)?
The wording is good but the patch places the comment into gcc-ar section
which is wrong. Perhaps make a separate section for driver like this?
-Y
Index: htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -r1.66 changes.html
--- htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html 17 Jan 2015 11:52:18 -0000 1.66
+++ htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html 19 Jan 2015 07:37:54 -0000
@@ -572,5 +572,11 @@
<li>The <code>gcc-ar, gcc-nm, gcc-ranlib</code> wrappers now
understand a <code>-B</code> option to set the compiler to use.</li>
</ul>
+ <h3 id="driver"></h3>
+ <ul>
+ <li>When the new command-line option <code>-freport-bug</code> is
+ used, GCC automatically generates a developer-friendly reproducer
+ whenever an internal compiler error is encountered.</li>
+ </ul>
</body>
</html>
