On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > > All of this has been posted before. > > I believe the ABI change is something we should have for gcc 5. > > Yes, the libffi merge has been causing problems (on targets that > don't even support libgo, annoyingly), but missing support for > the new libffi interfaces is easier to remedy in a dot release > than the change from __thread variable to static chain register > for implementing closures.
Thanks very much. Looks great. Committed to mainline. Ian
