On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:06 PM, James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:20:40AM +0000, Marcus Shawcroft wrote: >> On 15 January 2015 at 09:50, James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> >> wrote: >> >> > 2015-01-15 James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> >> > >> > * config/arm/cortex-a57.md: New. >> > * config/aarch64/aarch64.md: Include it. >> > * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def (cortex-a57): Tune for it. >> > * config/aarch64/aarch64-tune.md: Regenerate. >> >> This is low risk and only affects aarch64 backend. I think we should >> take this for gcc 5, so OK. > > Thanks Marcus, > > I committed this as revision 219724, but I made a mistake in applying > the patch and we ended up with two copies of the model in the same > file. > > I've committed the attached as revision 219746 as the obvious > fixup to my mistake. > > This should resolve the build failure that doko was seeing.
Can you also spin up a changes.html patch for the ARM / AArch64 ports while you are at it ? Ramana > > Thanks, > James > > --- > 2015-01-16 James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> > > * config/arm/cortex-a57.md: Remove duplicate of file accidentally > introduced in 219724. >
