On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> --- libcpp/expr.c.jj 2015-01-14 11:01:34.000000000 +0100
> +++ libcpp/expr.c 2015-01-14 14:35:52.851002344 +0100
> @@ -672,16 +672,17 @@ cpp_classify_number (cpp_reader *pfile,
> if ((result & CPP_N_WIDTH) == CPP_N_LARGE
> && CPP_OPTION (pfile, cpp_warn_long_long))
> {
> - const char *message = CPP_OPTION (pfile, cplusplus)
> - ? N_("use of C++11 long long integer constant")
> - : N_("use of C99 long long integer constant");
> -
> if (CPP_OPTION (pfile, c99))
> cpp_warning_with_line (pfile, CPP_W_LONG_LONG, virtual_location,
> - 0, message);
> + 0, CPP_OPTION (pfile, cplusplus)
> + ? "use of C++11 long long integer
> constant"
> + : "use of C99 long long integer
> constant");
> else
> cpp_pedwarning_with_line (pfile, CPP_W_LONG_LONG,
> - virtual_location, 0, message);
> + virtual_location, 0,
> + CPP_OPTION (pfile, cplusplus)
> + ? "use of C++11 long long integer
> constant"
> + : "use of C99 long long integer
> constant");
I think this sort of thing needs N_() on both messages so that they both
get extracted for translation.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
