On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:57 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:56 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>> -/* { dg-do compile { target { { { ! mips64 } && { ! ia64-*-* } } && { ! 
>>>>> spu-*-* } } } } */
>>>>> +/* { dg-do compile { target { { { { ! mips64 } && { ! ia64-*-* } } && { 
>>>>> ! spu-*-* } } && { ! x32 } } } } */
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hum, I worry about x86 walking away with large amounts of symbol space.  
>>>> Please change to x86 && x32 or x86_x32.
>>>
>>> gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c tests long long using on ilp32 targets.  It
>>> should be skipped on x32 similar to ia64, spu and mips.  I don''t
>>> know how x86 && x32 or x86_x32 will help here.
>>>
>>>>> -/* { dg-do compile } */
>>>>> +/* { dg-do compile { target { x32 || lp64 } } } */
>>>>
>>>> Likewise.
>>>
>>> gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c is tested if a target returns structures in register.
>>> Can you tell me how I can enable it for x32?
>>>
>>
>> I will fix them.
>
> Here is the updated patch.  I will wait for Uros's comments.
>

I attached the wrong file.  Here is the updated patch.



-- 
H.J.

Attachment: gcc-x32-test-2.patch.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data

Reply via email to