On Jul 7, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > on avr targets, the aggregate that we test to be totally scalarized > away is deemed to be to big for it - this is determined by the value > of MOVE_RATIO which is very low unless redefined by the target. This > is analogous situation to what we had with > testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.C a year ago, the solution there was > also to skip the test. > > And that's exactly what the patch below does, verified by running > make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=sra-12.c" on i686-linux and > an avr cross. Because of the pr42585.C precedent I consider it > obvious and will commit it tomorrow unless someone objects.
Ok, but please add a comment to it with a short quip about MOVE_RATIO being too small. The idea is that is someone else does a port to a machine similar in nature, they can say, yes, we are a small MOVE_RATIO type of port and I'll just skip it too. Thanks.
