Hi, Rainer - > >> > If so, I'd rather do it by adding some MFWRAP_OS_SPEC to avoid > >> > having to duplicate the whole spec in the Solaris config > >> > headers. > > > > Why would solaris have to duplicate MFWRAP_SPEC if mmap64 is added to > > the default gcc.c one? > > I assumed that you wanted to keep the default generic, and meant to > separate target specific additions from the generic part.
I don't have a strong opinion on this, but if you add mmap64 to the default, there need be no target-specific additions for solaris, right? So we can delay the decision to another day. > [...] > I could either commit the current version with the MFWRAP_SPEC addition > and work from there, or wait until those failures are understood and > fixed, too. Committing now would be fine, assuming no regressions on a primary platform. - FChE