On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou <ji...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hi Nicola, > > my patch is too simple compared to yours, feel free to work on it as much as > you wish, no need to credit me since you posted it independantly. I just > posted it to note that the inlining part is the one providing most > performance benefit. > > richi: I used always_inline because it is the case that you *never* want it > to be out-of-line, since it's a small wrapper function providing important > performance benefit. Do you think a macro would be better?
Well, just keep it as static inline function. We can't use always-inline because we have to support non-GCC host compilers. Richard. > > Thanks, > Dimitris > > P.S. Nicola, if you remember it, please keep me Cc'd in further posts of > yours related to performance of gcc > > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Nicola Pero wrote: >> >> Dimitrious >> >> I didn't realize you were working on this. Your patch is indeed very >> similar. :-) >> >> Can I go ahead and rewrite mine following Richard's suggestions (which >> would make it >> even more similar to yours), and add your name to the ChangeLog entry too >> ? >> >> Thanks >
