> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >>
> >> This also pretty much destroyed C++ for ia32:
> >>
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-06/msg00159.html
> >
> > Hi,
> > It seems somewhat amazing that we hit kernel sensitive miscompilation here.
> > The problem most probably is the fact that thunks and functions with thunks 
> > can become
> > local. This is correct since thunks are represented as direct calls now, 
> > but this
> > makes i386 to use local ABI when calling or compiling them.
> >
> 
> For x86-64, we use the same ABI for local and global. But RAX seems
> used and uninitialized in thunk.
000000000006d270 <_ZN12_GLOBAL__N_121system_error_categoryD0Ev>:
   6d270:       48 8d 05 79 d4 27 00    lea    0x27d479(%rip),%rax        #
2ea6f0 <_ZTVN12_GLOBAL__N_121system_error_categoryE+0x10>
   6d277:       53                      push   %rbx
   6d278:       48 89 fb                mov    %rdi,%rbx
   6d27b:       48 89 07                mov    %rax,(%rdi)
   6d27e:       e8 55 a0 fe ff          callq  572d8
<_ZNSt14error_categoryD2Ev@plt>
   6d283:       48 89 df                mov    %rbx,%rdi
   6d286:       5b                      pop    %rbx
   6d287:       e9 2c 9d fe ff          jmpq   56fb8 <_ZdlPv@plt>
   6d28c:       90                      nop
   6d28d:       90                      nop
   6d28e:       90                      nop
   6d28f:       90                      nop

I don't see uinitialized RAX here.  It is set by the first LEA
I will commit the patch now to unbreak x86 and work on more proper solution 
after debugging
the plugin usses.

Thanks for testing!
Honza
> 
> -- 
> H.J.

Reply via email to