On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Thomas Henlich wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 14:41, jerry DeLisle <jvdeli...@charter.net>
wrote:
This was established as solution to PR48488 where we had two choices
for
selecting the significant digits. Nine significant digits was
established as
a requirement to guarantee round trip in all cases. The
char4_iunit_1.f03
test case was revised because after we corrected the formatting in
PR48906,
it started to fail and I observed the test case was looking for the
wrong
number of significant digits.
Based on this, I would suggest we leave it as I have it, which is
correct.
I'm afraid it's not.
1.23450002E-06 has nine significant digits. That's how it should be.
We don't want 1PG16.9E2 editing for list-directed and G0,
but G16.9E2 for the F editing range and 1PE16.8E2 editing for the E
range.
This is to make sure the result always has nine significant digits,
whether in the F or E range.
My bad, I counted across wrong. Working on it. Coffee deficiency in
the early morning.
;)
Jerry
Jerry
