On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Now that there is a single place left to call set_sizetype we can
> > remove it and initialize sizetypes properly from the start
> > (in initialize_sizetypes).
>
> Can you give a meaningful TYPE_NAME to sizetype? Ada dump files now read:
>
> _GLOBAL.SZ0_discr31 (integer p0, integer p1)
> {
> return p1 <= p0 ? ((bitsizetype) ((<unnamed-unsigned:32>) p0 -
> (<unnamed-unsigned:32>) p1) + 1) * 8 : 0;
> }
>
> and this isn't very pretty.
It's on my todo - I need to fixup FEs to not expect a TYPE_DECL
everywhere.
Richard.
