On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> I'm worried by this whole approach of command-line checking.

Right, and this was essentially my point originally.  Luckily there is enough 
beef I think behind the curtains to do everything that needs doing without 
worrying about adding yet more infrastructure.

> Perhaps a better approach would be a new dg- test

A new mechanism would be necessary if the existing ones turn out to be poor or 
unworkable.  To be concrete, could you give a specific example of something 
that doesn't work well with the existing mechanisms?

Reply via email to