On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > I'm worried by this whole approach of command-line checking.
Right, and this was essentially my point originally. Luckily there is enough beef I think behind the curtains to do everything that needs doing without worrying about adding yet more infrastructure. > Perhaps a better approach would be a new dg- test A new mechanism would be necessary if the existing ones turn out to be poor or unworkable. To be concrete, could you give a specific example of something that doesn't work well with the existing mechanisms?
