On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Jun 6, 2011, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> You meant 4.6 stage1, but I missed it. How's it for 4.7 stage1? >>> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu. > >> Isn't exactly ICEing for num_ssa_operands/delink_stmt_imm_use. > > Uhh. Looks like I didn't update the patch per your comments before > putting it aside for stage1, after all. Sorry. > >> So, the op_iter_init change is ok, the other two not - they should >> either ICE or work for PHIs (by using FOR_EACH_PHI_OR_STMT_USE >> in them). > > The latter is legitimately called for GIMPLE_PHI, so I changed it to use > FOR_EACH_PHI_OR_STMT_USE. The former was never called for GIMPLE_PHIs, > so I put in an assert there. > > Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu. Ok?
Ok. Thanks, Richard. > > > > -- > Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ > You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi > Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member > Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer > >
