On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:14:39AM -0700, Langton, Asher wrote: > On 6/2/11 2:42 PM, "Langton, Asher" <langt...@llnl.gov> wrote: > >On 6/2/11 2:11 PM, "Steve Kargl" <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > >>On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:59:03PM -0700, Langton, Asher wrote: > >>> This patch fixes a bug where the wrong code was generated for > >>>assumed-size > >>> Cray pointees. The fix is simple, but a bit ugly. Bootstrapped and > >>> regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Okay for trunk? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Asher > >>> > >>> 2011-06-02 Asher Langton <langt...@llnl.gov> > >>> > >>> PR fortran/49268 > >>> * trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Treat assumed-size > >>>Cray > >>> pointees as AS_EXPLICIT. > >>> > >>> 2011-06-02 Asher Langton <langt...@llnl.gov> > >>> > >>> PR fortran/49268 > >>> * gfortran.dg/PR49268.f90: New test. > >> > >>OK. > > > >Committed at revision 174584. > > A gfortran user here at LLNL asked if this could be backported to the 4.6 > branch. I bootstrapped and regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. > Okay for 4.6?
OK. -- Steve
