On 06/06/11 13:15, Dmitry Plotnikov wrote:
+ && (const_ok_for_op (INTVAL (x), outer) + || const_ok_for_op (~INTVAL (x), outer))))
The second call is redundant. const_ok_for_op should already do that. Andrew
On 06/06/11 13:15, Dmitry Plotnikov wrote:
+ && (const_ok_for_op (INTVAL (x), outer) + || const_ok_for_op (~INTVAL (x), outer))))
The second call is redundant. const_ok_for_op should already do that. Andrew