Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This limits this testcase to i?86/x86_64 (moving to gcc.target/ would
>> be harder because it relies on all the weirdo vectorization options to be
>> passed), because apparently on strict alignment targets we don't handle
>> aligned (1) non-aggregates correctly. Or should it be instead xfailed
>> just on selected strict-aligned targets?
>
> This has come up in the past, I think we should have an
> strict-align target capability in our dejagnu harness (possibly
> just white-listing all patterns we know). So we can
> dg-skip this test for strict-align ones. Would you mind implementing
> that?
That list is quite long, though: there are currently 28 instances of
#define STRICT_ALIGNMENT 1
in gcc/config, with a couple of others being variable. Wouldn't it be
better to have a proper testcase instead?
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
