On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:57 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:05 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:57 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:40 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:28 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Richard Guenther >>>>> <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:12 AM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 05:20:48PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >>>>>>>> This patch uses .init_array/.fini_array sections instead of >>>>>>>> .ctors/.dtors sections if mixing .init_array/.fini_array and >>>>>>>> .ctors/.dtors sections with init_priority works. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It removes .ctors/.ctors sections from executables and DSOes, which >>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>> remove one function call at startup time from each executable and DSO. >>>>>>>> It should reduce image size and improve system startup time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If a platform with a working .init_array/.fini_array support needs a >>>>>>>> different .init_array/.fini_array implementation, it can set >>>>>>>> use_initfini_array to no. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Since .init_array/.fini_array is a target feature. >>>>>>>> --enable-initfini-array >>>>>>>> is default to no unless the native run-time test is passed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To pass the native run-time test, a linker with SORT_BY_INIT_PRIORITY >>>>>>>> support is required. The binutils patch is available at >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-12/msg00466.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Linker patch has been checked in. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This patch passed 32bit/64bit regression test on Linux/x86-64. Any >>>>>>>> comments? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This updated patch fixes build on Linux/ia64 and should work on others. >>>>>>> Any comments? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. This is stage1 material. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here is the updated patch. OK for trunk? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> H.J. >>>>> ---- >>>>> 2011-03-14 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com> >>>>> >>>>> PR target/46770 >>>>> * acinclude.m4 (gcc_AC_INITFINI_ARRAY): Removed. >>>>> >>>>> * config.gcc (use_initfini_array): New variable. >>>>> Use initfini-array.o if supported. >>>>> >>>>> * crtstuff.c: Don't generate .ctors nor .dtors sections if >>>>> NO_CTORS_DTORS_SECTIONS is defined. >>>>> >>>>> * configure.ac: Remove gcc_AC_INITFINI_ARRAY. Add >>>>> --enable-initfini-array and check if .init_array can be used with >>>>> .ctors. >>>>> >>>>> * configure: Regenerated. >>>>> >>>>> * config/initfini-array.c: New. >>>>> * config/initfini-array.h: Likewise. >>>>> * config/t-initfini-array: Likewise. >>>>> >>>>> * config/arm/arm.c (arm_asm_init_sections): Call >>>>> elf_initfini_array_init_sections if NO_CTORS_DTORS_SECTIONS >>>>> is defined. >>>>> * config/avr/avr.c (avr_asm_init_sections): Likewise. >>>>> * config/ia64/ia64.c (ia64_asm_init_sections): Likewise. >>>>> * config/mep/mep.c (mep_asm_init_sections): Likewise. >>>>> * config/microblaze/microblaze.c >>>>> (microblaze_elf_asm_init_sections): >>>>> Likewise. >>>>> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_elf_asm_init_sections): Likewise. >>>>> * config/stormy16/stormy16.c (xstormy16_asm_init_sections): >>>>> Likewise. >>>>> * config/v850/v850.c (v850_asm_init_sections): Likewise. >>>>> >>>> >>>> PING: >>>> >>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00760.html >>>> >>> >>> Any comments? Any objections? >>> >> >> Here is the patch updated for the current trunk. OK for trunk? >> > > PING,.
Hi Richard, You commented my patch was stage 1 material: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01989.html Is my patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00760.html OK for trunk? Thanks. -- H.J.
