On 28 May 2011 20:08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28 May 2011 18:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> One more test
>>
>> 2011-05-28 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
>>
>> * testsuite/20_util/pointer_traits/pointer_to.cc: New.
>>
>> Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
>>
>
> This new test is failing, I'm looking into why, will revert it if necessary
> ...
>
2011-05-28 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
* testsuite/20_util/pointer_traits/pointer_to.cc: Fix.
I added the pointer_traits<Ptr> case at the last minute and it was
broken, not sure how I didn't notice - I must have tested in the wrong
directory. This fixes it, definitely tested this time, sorry for the
mess!
Index: testsuite/20_util/pointer_traits/pointer_to.cc
===================================================================
--- testsuite/20_util/pointer_traits/pointer_to.cc (revision 174381)
+++ testsuite/20_util/pointer_traits/pointer_to.cc (working copy)
@@ -24,15 +24,17 @@
struct Ptr
{
typedef bool element_type;
+ bool* value;
- static bool* pointer_to(bool& b) { return 0; }
+ static Ptr pointer_to(bool& b) { return Ptr{&b}; }
};
void test01()
{
bool test = true;
+ Ptr p{&test};
- VERIFY( std::pointer_traits<Ptr>::pointer_to(test) == 0 );
+ VERIFY( std::pointer_traits<Ptr>::pointer_to(test).value == &test );
}
void test02()
