Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> writes: > gcc/ > PR rtl-optimization/48826 > * emit-rtl.c (try_split): When splitting a call that is followed > by a NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION, move the note after the new call.
It turns out that this isn't enough. In the attached testcase, we have a: (var_location pc (nil)) note between the call and the CALL_ARG_LOCATION. A quick look at the var-tracking flow suggests that this is legitimate, so we need to look at every note before the next real insn, rather than just looking at the first. I assume the ARM, SH and S390 reorg code would also need to cope with this case. If this usage isn't legitimate, and the CALL_ARG_LOCATION is supposed to come directly after the call, then it would be great if someone more familiar with the var-tracking code could have a look at it. Otherwise, patch bootstrapped & regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. Also tested on mips-linux-gnu. OK to install? Richard gcc/ * emit-rtl.c (try_split): Use a loop to search for NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATIONs. gcc/testsuite/ From Ryan Mansfield * gcc.dg/pr48826.c: New test. Index: gcc/emit-rtl.c =================================================================== --- gcc/emit-rtl.c 2011-05-28 17:08:48.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc/emit-rtl.c 2011-05-28 18:23:28.000000000 +0100 @@ -3494,16 +3494,15 @@ try_split (rtx pat, rtx trial, int last) we must move any following NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION note so that it comes immediately after the new call. */ if (NEXT_INSN (insn)) - { - next = NEXT_INSN (trial); - if (next - && NOTE_P (next) - && NOTE_KIND (next) == NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION) + for (next = NEXT_INSN (trial); + next && NOTE_P (next); + next = NEXT_INSN (next)) + if (NOTE_KIND (next) == NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION) { remove_insn (next); add_insn_after (next, insn, NULL); + break; } - } } } Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48826.c =================================================================== --- /dev/null 2011-05-28 09:03:52.070295797 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48826.c 2011-05-28 18:12:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +/* { dg-options "-O -g -w" } */ + +void bar (int *); + +void +foo () +{ + int *const pc = __builtin_return_address (0); + bar (pc); +}