Rainer has verified the following patch fixes the problem he observed in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49170. OK to commit?
2011-05-27 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> PR tree-optimization/49170 * tree-ssa-math-opts.c (execute_cse_sincos): Add checks for sincos or cexp. Index: tree-ssa-math-opts.c =================================================================== --- tree-ssa-math-opts.c (revision 174277) +++ tree-ssa-math-opts.c (working copy) @@ -1093,6 +1093,10 @@ execute_cse_sincos (void) CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_COS): CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_SIN): CASE_FLT_FN (BUILT_IN_CEXPI): + /* Make sure we have either sincos or cexp. */ + if (!TARGET_HAS_SINCOS && !TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS) + break; + arg = gimple_call_arg (stmt, 0); if (TREE_CODE (arg) == SSA_NAME) cfg_changed |= execute_cse_sincos_1 (arg);