On 05/27/2011 11:05 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
That only shows up if you configure with --enable-libstcxx-time
I'll finish reg-testing it and submit it when I get home this evening.
thanks Jon. Looks like we have also to fix parallel-mode (49187), I
hope there isn't too much to reshuffle, if you spot something...
Additionally to the below.
Paolo.
//////////////
Index: losertree.h
===================================================================
--- losertree.h (revision 174324)
+++ losertree.h (working copy)
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@
{
typedef _LoserTreeBase<_Tp, _Compare> _Base;
using _Base::_M_k;
+ using _Base::_M_comp;
using _Base::_M_losers;
using _Base::_M_first_insert;
@@ -263,6 +264,7 @@
typedef _LoserTreeBase<_Tp, _Compare> _Base;
using _Base::_M_log_k;
using _Base::_M_k;
+ using _Base::_M_comp;
using _Base::_M_losers;
using _Base::_M_first_insert;
@@ -409,6 +411,7 @@
{
typedef _LoserTreePointerBase<_Tp, _Compare> _Base;
using _Base::_M_k;
+ using _Base::_M_comp;
using _Base::_M_losers;
public:
@@ -490,6 +493,7 @@
{
typedef _LoserTreePointerBase<_Tp, _Compare> _Base;
using _Base::_M_k;
+ using _Base::_M_comp;
using _Base::_M_losers;
public:
@@ -644,6 +648,7 @@
{
typedef _LoserTreeUnguardedBase<_Tp, _Compare> _Base;
using _Base::_M_k;
+ using _Base::_M_comp;
using _Base::_M_losers;
public:
@@ -731,6 +736,7 @@
{
typedef _LoserTreeUnguardedBase<_Tp, _Compare> _Base;
using _Base::_M_k;
+ using _Base::_M_comp;
using _Base::_M_losers;
public:
@@ -887,6 +893,7 @@
{
typedef _LoserTreePointerUnguardedBase<_Tp, _Compare> _Base;
using _Base::_M_k;
+ using _Base::_M_comp;
using _Base::_M_losers;
public:
@@ -972,6 +979,7 @@
{
typedef _LoserTreePointerUnguardedBase<_Tp, _Compare> _Base;
using _Base::_M_k;
+ using _Base::_M_comp;
using _Base::_M_losers;
public: