Hello,

The attached patch moves the creation of anti-dep edge from a
branch to it's def from create_ddg_dep_from_intra_loop_link () to
add_cross_iteration_register_deps  () due to the fact the edge is with
distance 1 and thus should be in the later function.
The edge was added to avoid creating reg-moves.

The patch was tested together with the rest of the patches in this series.
On ppc64-redhat-linux regtest as well as bootstrap with SMS flags
enabling SMS also on loops with stage count 1.  Regtested on SPU.
On arm-linux-gnueabi regtseted on c,c++. Bootstrap c language with SMS
flags enabling SMS also on loops with stage count 1.

OK for mainline?

Thanks,
Revital

        * ddg.c (create_ddg_dep_from_intra_loop_link): Remove the creation
        of anti-dep edge from a branch.
        (add_cross_iteration_register_deps): Create anti-dep edge from
        a branch.


Index: ddg.c
===================================================================
--- ddg.c       (revision 173785)
+++ ddg.c       (working copy)
@@ -197,11 +197,6 @@ create_ddg_dep_from_intra_loop_link (ddg
         }
     }

-  /* If a true dep edge enters the branch create an anti edge in the
-     opposite direction to prevent the creation of reg-moves.  */
-  if ((DEP_TYPE (link) == REG_DEP_TRUE) && JUMP_P (dest_node->insn))
-    create_ddg_dep_no_link (g, dest_node, src_node, ANTI_DEP, REG_DEP, 1);
-
    latency = dep_cost (link);
    e = create_ddg_edge (src_node, dest_node, t, dt, latency, distance);
    add_edge_to_ddg (g, e);
@@ -306,8 +301,11 @@ add_cross_iteration_register_deps (ddg_p

          gcc_assert (first_def_node);

+         /* Always create the edge if the use node is a branch in
+            order to prevent the creation of reg-moves.  */
           if (DF_REF_ID (last_def) != DF_REF_ID (first_def)
-              || !flag_modulo_sched_allow_regmoves)
+              || !flag_modulo_sched_allow_regmoves
+             || (flag_modulo_sched_allow_regmoves && JUMP_P (use_node->insn)))
             create_ddg_dep_no_link (g, use_node, first_def_node, ANTI_DEP,
                                     REG_DEP, 1);

Reply via email to