On 05/18/2011 05:41 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Toon Moene<t...@moene.org> wrote:
On 05/17/2011 08:32 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu {, m32} with --enable-build-with-cxx.
Committed to mainline SVN as obvious.
Does that mean that I can now remove the --disable-werror from my daily C++
bootstrap run ?
Well, that certainly worked, as exemplified by this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-05/msg01890.html
At least that would enable my daily run (between 18:10 and 20:10 UTC) to
catch -Werror mistakes ...
It's great that some people understand the intricacies of the
infight^H^H^H^H^H^H differences between the C and C++ type model.
OK: 1/2 :-)
I suspect this infight would vanish if we just switched, as we discussed
in the past.
Perhaps it would just help if we implemented the next step of the plan
(http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/gcc-in-cxx):
# "it would be a good thing to try forcing the C++ host compiler
requirement for GCC 4.[7] with just building stage1 with C++ and
stage2/3 with the stage1 C compiler. --disable-build-with-cxx would be a
workaround for a missing C++ host compiler."
Of course, that still wouldn't make it possible to implement C++
solutions for C hacks because the "--disable-build-with-cxx" crowd would
cry "foul" over this ...
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
