On Wed, 18 May 2011, DJ Delorie wrote:

> At this point, though, I'm tempted to say "there's no such thing as a
> target libiberty" and rip all the target-libiberty rules out, and let

Yes please.  I've been arguing for that for some time.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-04/msg00410.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-03/msg00002.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-03/msg00012.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01231.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-03/msg00206.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-03/msg00465.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg02304.html

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com

Reply via email to