On 14 May 2011 21:15, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 05/14/2011 12:42 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: >> Duly noted, I'll keep that in mind for subsequent ones. Is the patch >> otherwise ok? > Yes, and I've applied it.
Cool, thanks! I'm not quite sure whether there are ambiguities in the case of elaborate-specifiers, but I suppose those can be fixed later. Should these facilities be somehow flagged 0x-only? I haven't done that at all.. Somebody should probably update the C++0x status page, and refer to N3206 rather than to N2928 for explicit virtual overrides, and mark it done?
