On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2011/5/12 Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com>:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> While testing some other issues with C++'s __java_boolean type
>>> occurred. So I adjusted check in test-cfg.c as you suggested.
>>> Additionally due the fact that we are now boolifying conditions for
>>> even BOOLEAN_TYPE'ed cases (for making sure inner arms are boolified,
>>> too), we possibly would alter here truth-type provided by FE. To
>>> restore original type (for types != boolean-type), we do type
>>> conversion always back to FE's used type for truth-AND/OR/XOR/etc as
>>> result.
>>
>> boolean_type_node is the only BOOLEAN_TYPE node we have,
>> so please remove the !=/== boolean_type_node checks again, or,
>> if you want more visual consistency with the adjustment gimple_boolify
>> makes replace them with !=/== boolean_type_node comparisons
>> completely.
>>
>> Ok with either change.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard.
>>
>>> Patch bootstrapped with all languages on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>>> (multilib). Ok for apply?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kai
>>>
>>> Index: gcc/gcc/gimplify.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- gcc.orig/gcc/gimplify.c     2011-05-12 09:02:58.946243000 +0200
>>> +++ gcc/gcc/gimplify.c  2011-05-12 15:13:59.534550700 +0200
>>> @@ -2824,9 +2824,6 @@ gimple_boolify (tree expr)
>>>        }
>>>     }
>>>
>>> -  if (TREE_CODE (type) == BOOLEAN_TYPE)
>>> -    return expr;
>>> -
>>>   switch (TREE_CODE (expr))
>>>     {
>>>     case TRUTH_AND_EXPR:
>>> @@ -2851,6 +2848,9 @@ gimple_boolify (tree expr)
>>>     default:
>>>       /* Other expressions that get here must have boolean values, but
>>>         might need to be converted to the appropriate mode.  */
>>> +      if (TREE_CODE (type) == BOOLEAN_TYPE
>>> +          && type == boolean_type_node)
>>> +       return expr;
>>>       return fold_convert_loc (loc, boolean_type_node, expr);
>>>     }
>>>  }
>>> @@ -4695,31 +4695,6 @@ gimplify_scalar_mode_aggregate_compare (
>>>   return GS_OK;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -/* Gimplify TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR and TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR expressions.  EXPR_P
>>> -   points to the expression to gimplify.
>>> -
>>> -   Expressions of the form 'a && b' are gimplified to:
>>> -
>>> -       a && b ? true : false
>>> -
>>> -   LOCUS is the source location to be put on the generated COND_EXPR.
>>> -   gimplify_cond_expr will do the rest.  */
>>> -
>>> -static enum gimplify_status
>>> -gimplify_boolean_expr (tree *expr_p, location_t locus)
>>> -{
>>> -  /* Preserve the original type of the expression.  */
>>> -  tree type = TREE_TYPE (*expr_p);
>>> -
>>> -  *expr_p = build3 (COND_EXPR, type, *expr_p,
>>> -                   fold_convert_loc (locus, type, boolean_true_node),
>>> -                   fold_convert_loc (locus, type, boolean_false_node));
>>> -
>>> -  SET_EXPR_LOCATION (*expr_p, locus);
>>> -
>>> -  return GS_OK;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>  /* Gimplify an expression sequence.  This function gimplifies each
>>>    expression and rewrites the original expression with the last
>>>    expression of the sequence in GIMPLE form.
>>> @@ -6762,12 +6737,26 @@ gimplify_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq
>>>
>>>        case TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR:
>>>        case TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR:
>>> -         /* Pass the source location of the outer expression.  */
>>> -         ret = gimplify_boolean_expr (expr_p, saved_location);
>>> -         break;
>>> +         {
>>> +           /* Preserve the original type of the expression and the
>>> +              source location of the outer expression.  */
>>> +           tree org_type = TREE_TYPE (*expr_p);
>>> +           *expr_p = gimple_boolify (*expr_p);
>>> +           *expr_p = build3_loc (saved_location, COND_EXPR,
>>> +                                 org_type, *expr_p,
>>> +                                 fold_convert_loc
>>> +                                   (saved_location,
>>> +                                    org_type, boolean_true_node),
>>> +                                 fold_convert_loc
>>> +                                   (saved_location,
>>> +                                    org_type, boolean_false_node));
>>> +           ret = GS_OK;
>>> +           break;
>>> +         }
>>>
>>>        case TRUTH_NOT_EXPR:
>>> -         if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (*expr_p)) != BOOLEAN_TYPE)
>>> +         if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (*expr_p)) != BOOLEAN_TYPE
>>> +             || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (*expr_p)) != boolean_type_node)
>>>            {
>>>              tree type = TREE_TYPE (*expr_p);
>>>              *expr_p = fold_convert (type, gimple_boolify (*expr_p));
>>> @@ -7203,6 +7192,24 @@ gimplify_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq
>>>        case TRUTH_AND_EXPR:
>>>        case TRUTH_OR_EXPR:
>>>        case TRUTH_XOR_EXPR:
>>> +         {
>>> +           tree org_type = TREE_TYPE (*expr_p);
>>> +
>>> +           *expr_p = gimple_boolify (*expr_p);
>>> +
>>> +           /* This shouldn't happen, but due fold-const (and here 
>>> especially
>>> +              fold_truth_not_expr) happily uses operand type and doesn't
>>> +              automatically uses boolean_type as result, we need to keep
>>> +              orignal type.  */
>>> +           if (TREE_CODE (org_type) != BOOLEAN_TYPE
>>> +               || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (org_type)) != boolean_type_node)
>>> +             {
>>> +               *expr_p = fold_convert (org_type, *expr_p);
>>> +               ret = GS_OK;
>>> +               break;
>>> +             }
>>> +         }
>>> +
>>>          /* Classified as tcc_expression.  */
>>>          goto expr_2;
>>>
>>> Index: gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- gcc.orig/gcc/tree-cfg.c     2011-05-12 09:02:58.989243000 +0200
>>> +++ gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c  2011-05-12 14:50:19.656249100 +0200
>>> @@ -3541,10 +3541,10 @@ do_pointer_plus_expr_check:
>>>     case TRUTH_OR_EXPR:
>>>     case TRUTH_XOR_EXPR:
>>>       {
>>> -       /* We allow any kind of integral typed argument and result.  */
>>> -       if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (rhs1_type)
>>> -           || !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (rhs2_type)
>>> -           || !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (lhs_type))
>>> +       /* We allow only boolean typed or compatible argument and result.  
>>> */
>>> +       if (!useless_type_conversion_p (boolean_type_node,  rhs1_type)
>>> +           || !useless_type_conversion_p (boolean_type_node,  rhs2_type)
>>> +           || !useless_type_conversion_p (boolean_type_node,  lhs_type))
>>>          {
>>>            error ("type mismatch in binary truth expression");
>>>            debug_generic_expr (lhs_type);
>>>
>>
>
> Committed at revision 173711 with removing check for !=/== boolean_type_node.
>

This caused:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48984


-- 
H.J.

Reply via email to