On May 9, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > The guality tests have random results. I don't know if that's the issue > here, but perhaps someone can review Jeff's patch > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01060.html> to make them > more predictable. Without that, I generally just ignore them in > comparisons of test results.
:-( Thanks for the heads up. I've approved it. If people find those testcases useful, please, ensure they are deterministic and test something useful. If they aren't up to standards as a whole, I'd entertain just adding a return 0 near the top of the .exp file to prompt people that would like them in the tree to address outstanding issues.
