Ping. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02075.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02155.html
Should I prepare a patch that does this at -g1, and makes "-g1 -g" the same as "-g2"? -cary On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 04/26/2011 06:57 PM, Cary Coutant wrote: >> >> I considered just changing -g1 to do this, with the argument that >> "enough for making backtraces" ought to include line numbers and >> inlined function calls, but I wasn't familiar enough with existing >> uses of -g1 to go with that alternative. I'm certainly willing to go >> that route, though, if that's preferable. > > That makes sense to me; it seems appropriate for -g1 to have information > that makes a backtrace more informative, but not information for interactive > debugging. Jim, do you have an opinion? > > Jason >
