On 04/29/2011 06:26 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
"Joseph" == Joseph S Myers<jos...@codesourcery.com> writes:
Joseph> This patch, relative to a tree with
Joseph> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02123.html> applied,
Joseph> continues the cleanup of toplevel cases relating to disabling Java or
Joseph> Java libraries by arranging for Java to be disabled (via
Joseph> unsupported_languages) on targets not supporting libffi
It does make sense to build libjava without libffi.
... and it does make sense to build libffi without libjava, e.g. for libgo.
There is also --without-libffi, though; I didn't look to see what your
patch does with this.
--with/without-libffi is trouble zone of its own.
At least the libgo part in gcc-4.6 doesn't work at all:
c.f. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48407
Ralf
