On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:22, Jerry DeLisle <jvdeli...@frontier.com> wrote: > On 04/27/2011 12:57 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: >> So the change is that now it prints the same number of significant >> digits in E and F mode, both for list formatted output and kPG0 when >> k>=0. For list formatted we can do pretty much what we want, and for >> G0 the standard only says the processor can choose appropriate values >> for w, d, and e. So far we have chosen d and e only based on the kind, >> but AFAICS nothing prevents taking into account the magnitude as well. >> >> I haven't modified any of the testcases so I expect some number of >> regressions due to that, but I'm asking for opinions on the approach >> itself before doing that. >> > > Actually only saw one test case failure which I have adjusted. The attached > patch applies Janne's patch to my patch and the fix for pr48787. Regression > tested on x86-64. > > OK for trunk? I sure would like to get this in so I can move on to other > things.
Ok. -- Janne Blomqvist
