> I guess that patch does indeed address both correctness and performance > aspects, but I wasn't sure attempting to pull those apart was a safer > option, given that at least in its current form it has seen testing in > mainline ...
Reasonable enough indeed. > I'd certainly be happy to try out a more stripped down patch; could you be > more specific about exactly which parts you want me to omit? The "We can perform the transformation if" thing, but in the end I agree that it's probably better to backport the unmodified changes. Thanks. -- Eric Botcazou
