On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:54:37PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2011 01:06:26 Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > It's an 'if -- else if' construct. If gfc_notify_std == FAILURE, then
> > the error message is issues and the function returns. If it is TRUE,
> > then there should be no messages and else if() is tested.
> My concern is that gfc_notify_std seems to return SUCCESS on warnings (I
> can't
> test right now as make has decided to rebuild the whole middle-end :-().
> Then,
> I expect double warnings with -pedantic -Wreal-q-constant as -pedantic is a
> (the only one ?) case outputing warnings for GNU extensions.
>
> Mikael
laptop:kargl[220] gfc4x -pedantic -Wreal-q-constant -o z ui.f90
ui.f90:3.12:
q = 1.23q45
1
Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1)
laptop:kargl[221] gfc4x -pedantic -o z ui.f90
ui.f90:3.12:
q = 1.23q45
1
Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1)
laptop:kargl[222] gfc4x -Wreal-q-constant -o z ui.f90
ui.f90:3.12:
q = 1.23q45
1
Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1)
PS: People should not use -pedantic, anyway. It doesn't do what
people think it does.
--
Steve
