Mike Stump wrote: > On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:04 AM, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Mike Stump wrote: >>> I think these are obvious. >> >> Which means that you can commit them without getting explicit approval > > Well, technically, it means nothing... It only means something if the > maintainer agrees with me, which in general we won't know until they > weighing. Any person that checks in under that rule runs the risk of > a, no it isn't. Now, if we had an obviousness maintainer, they could > just approve it; we'd only need a wave of a magic wand to get one. > :-)
Hi Mike, If you hadn't said anything, I would have committed those typo fixes by now, based on what I perceived as your review/approval and on my reading of this part of http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html: Free for all The following changes can be made by everyone with SVN write access: Fixes for obvious typos in ChangeLog files, docs, web pages, comments and similar stuff. Just check in the fix and copy it to gcc-patches. We don't want to get overly anal-retentive about checkin policies. If that policy is no longer in effect or does not apply here, can you clarify or point to a more up to date policy?
