On Apr 15, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> If it can be bool, it should be bool. > > Rather basic principle IMO. Consistency is of much greater value.
Yes, and consistency is had by upgrading existing int uses that should be bool to bool as they are spotted.... :-) I prefer doing this, even if done one at a time. If one discourages it from being done, they run the risk of it being done later. I'd rather have it sooner in this case.
