2011/4/14 Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de>:
> This tests are intended to reveal the respective PRs because the test
> case is more stable under slight variations in code (both of
> application or compiler).
>
> This test case migh also be helpful for older versions of avr-gcc, in
> particular if PR41894 is actually fixed.
>
> 2011-04-14 Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de>
>
> PR target/46779
> PR target/45291
> PR target/41894
> * gcc.target/avr/pr46779-1.c: New test case
> * gcc.target/avr/pr46779-2.c: New test case
>
__asm volatile ("ldi %B0, 56" : "+y" (y));
It's wrong expression. "+y" must be "=y".
Is this ("+y") required for working test case ?
Denis.
