2011/4/13 Pedro Alves <pe...@codesourcery.com>: > On Tuesday 12 April 2011 19:53:42, Kai Tietz wrote: >> 2011/4/12 Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com>: >> > On 04/12/2011 05:47 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: >> >> ChangeLog gcc/ >> >> >> >> * config/i386/mingw32.h (TARGET_SUBTARGET_DEFAULT): Add >> >> MASK_MS_BITFIELD_LAYOUT bit. >> >> >> >> ChangeLog gcc/testsuite >> >> >> >> * g++.dg/ext/bitfield2.C: Add for i?86/x86_64-*-mingw* >> >> targets the additional -mno-ms-bitfields and >> >> -Wno-packed-bitfield-compat options. >> >> * g++.dg/ext/bitfield3.C: Likewise. >> >> * g++.dg/ext/bitfield4.C: Likewise. >> >> * g++.dg/ext/bitfield5.C: Likewise. >> >> * gcc.dg/bitfld-15.c: Likewise. >> >> * gcc.dg/bitfld-16.c: Likewise. >> >> * gcc.dg/bitfld-17.c: Likewise. >> >> * gcc.dg/bitfld-18.c: Likewise. >> > >> > Ok. >> > >> > >> > r~ >> > >> >> >> Applied at revision 172336. >> >> Thanks, >> Kai >> > > This is a default ABI change (IIRC, when the option was > introduced, it was left off as default so to not break the ABI). > > Shouldn't we advertise it somewhere? > > -- > Pedro Alves >
Yes, I did recently a lot of abi changing for mingw's targets. They all will need a nice description (and possible ways to get old default behavior) in changes.html I collect them for later. Or do you mean it should be noted earlier? Regards, Kai
