On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:18:01AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > The propagate_for_debug change alone could fix it, we should never > > fall through into next basic block. We are unforuntately not deleting > > just jumps (which ought to appear at the end of bbs), but also > > any other noop moves, which I think is unintentional, we have > > delete_noop_moves that should clean that up instead (see the second patch). > > Yes, I wondered several times about that. This clearly looks unintentional > and > I agree that it is worth fixing on the mainline, adding gcc_assert (at_end); > to > update_cfg_for_uncondjump in the process.
Here is a patch, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Ok for trunk? 2011-04-12 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> * combine.c (update_cfg_for_uncondjump): Instead of testing at_end assert it is always true. (try_combine): Don't call update_cfg_for_uncondjump for noop non-jump moves. --- gcc/combine.c.jj 2011-04-12 12:52:11.963669819 +0200 +++ gcc/combine.c 2011-04-12 16:31:57.059671430 +0200 @@ -2490,13 +2490,12 @@ static void update_cfg_for_uncondjump (rtx insn) { basic_block bb = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn); - bool at_end = (BB_END (bb) == insn); + gcc_assert (BB_END (bb) == insn); - if (at_end) - purge_dead_edges (bb); + purge_dead_edges (bb); delete_insn (insn); - if (at_end && EDGE_COUNT (bb->succs) == 1) + if (EDGE_COUNT (bb->succs) == 1) { rtx insn; @@ -4409,7 +4408,8 @@ try_combine (rtx i3, rtx i2, rtx i1, rtx /* A noop might also need cleaning up of CFG, if it comes from the simplification of a jump. */ - if (GET_CODE (newpat) == SET + if (JUMP_P (i3) + && GET_CODE (newpat) == SET && SET_SRC (newpat) == pc_rtx && SET_DEST (newpat) == pc_rtx) { @@ -4418,6 +4418,7 @@ try_combine (rtx i3, rtx i2, rtx i1, rtx } if (undobuf.other_insn != NULL_RTX + && JUMP_P (undobuf.other_insn) && GET_CODE (PATTERN (undobuf.other_insn)) == SET && SET_SRC (PATTERN (undobuf.other_insn)) == pc_rtx && SET_DEST (PATTERN (undobuf.other_insn)) == pc_rtx) Jakub