On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I used it exactly for that. And also to verify that passes don't > do anything if replicated (well, for those that shouldn't at least).
What about passes that undo the work of previous patches -- and then followed by a patch that re-does the changes? Think CPROP -> loop-invariant -> CPROP, and I'm sure there are other examples. That kind of thing makes the statistics gathering a bit suspect... Ciao! Steven
