On 03/28/2011 03:10 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 03/27/2011 03:17 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
>> +(define_predicate "reg_or_ior_operand"
>> +  (match_code "subreg,reg,const_int")
>> +{
>> +  return (register_operand (op, mode)
>> +      || (GET_CODE (op) == CONST_INT && ior_mask_p (INTVAL (op))));
>> +})
>> +
> 
> Better written, IMO, as...

(define_predicate "ior_operand"
  (and (match_code "const_int")
       (match_test "ior_mask_p (INTVAL (op))")))

(define_predicate "reg_or_ior_operand"
  (ior (match_operand 0 "register_operand")
       (match_operand 0 "ior_operand")))


You've already got an ior_operand, which has a redundant test for CONST_INT.
Actually, this is true of quite a few of the PA predicates...


r~

Reply via email to