2011/3/21 Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de>: > Denis Chertykov schrieb: >> 2011/3/18 Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de>: >> >>>> Is it tested for regressions ? >>>> >>>> Denis. >>> I ran tests against svn 170942 (latest 4.7.0 snapshot). Besides >>> timestamps, the diff looks like this: >>> >>> 1435a1436,1437 >>>> XPASS: gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c execution test >>>> XPASS: gcc.dg/sibcall-4.c execution test >>> 1630,1631c1632,1633 >>> < # of unexpected successes 4 >>> < # of expected failures 132 >>> --- >>>> # of unexpected successes 6 >>>> # of expected failures 130 >>> 1670c1672 >>> >>> This is due to xfail for runtime-test of sibcall abilities for avr-*-*. >>> >> >> >> So, the patch can be committed. >> Please, prepare the final version of the patch. > > Patch updated to trunk, some more comment.
Seems strange, I have a many messages from patch: patching file avr-protos.h patching file avr.md Hunk #1 succeeded at 2646 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 3234 (offset -9 lines). patching file avr.c Hunk #2 succeeded at 250 with fuzz 2 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 352 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 388 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 397 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 405 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 413 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 934 (offset 56 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 945 (offset 56 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 1089 with fuzz 1 (offset 57 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 1703 (offset 57 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 1754 (offset 57 lines). Hunk #13 succeeded at 1778 (offset 57 lines). patching file avr.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 826 (offset 4 lines). Denis.
