> It broke build, hopefully for trivial reasons. It seems like
> your bugzilla options are set to not receive email, so I'll have
> to bug you like this, and ask that you please have a look at
> PR48130.
No problem. Sorry about the breakage. Indeed, it was trivial.
> > tested x86_64/linux
tested x86/64, compiled arm-eabi
-benjamin
2011-03-14 Benjamin Kosnik <b...@redhat.com>
PR libstdc++/48130
* src/future.cc: Guard definitions.
* libsupc++/nested_exception.cc: Same.
Index: src/future.cc
===================================================================
--- src/future.cc (revision 170978)
+++ src/future.cc (working copy)
@@ -79,11 +79,14 @@
const char*
future_error::what() const throw() { return _M_code.message().c_str(); }
+#if defined(_GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS) && defined(_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1) \
+ && defined(_GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_4)
__future_base::_Result_base::_Result_base() = default;
__future_base::_Result_base::~_Result_base() = default;
__future_base::_State_base::~_State_base() = default;
+#endif
_GLIBCXX_END_NAMESPACE_VERSION
} // namespace std
Index: libsupc++/nested_exception.cc
===================================================================
--- libsupc++/nested_exception.cc (revision 170978)
+++ libsupc++/nested_exception.cc (working copy)
@@ -25,5 +25,7 @@
namespace std
{
+#ifdef _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_4
nested_exception::~nested_exception() = default;
+#endif
} // namespace std
