* Florian Weimer: > I have run "make check-c++" with no new failures on x86_64-gnu-linux > twice, with the operator new[] check enabled and disabled; there were > no new failures. If the check is disabled, trunk and patch produce > identical assembler code for the test case. > > I still need some guidance where to put the test case. There don't > seem to be any direct tests for operator new[] funcionality. > > 2011-02-21 Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> > > * c.opt (foperator-new-overflow-check): New. > > 2011-02-21 Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> > > PR c++/19351 > > * init.c (maybe_build_size_mult_saturated, build_new_size_expr): Add. > (build_new_1): Use these new functions in size calculations. > > * call.c (build_operator_new_call): Add size_with_cookie argument. > * cp-tree.h (build_operator_new_call): Likewise.
Sorry, but: ping? <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01376.html>
