https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abab49fd4be11bb44d9b5ccfa27213e47b8ace8d

commit r16-7856-gabab49fd4be11bb44d9b5ccfa27213e47b8ace8d
Author: Patrick Palka <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Mar 2 22:37:15 2026 -0500

    c++: improve constraint recursion diagnostic
    
    Our constraint recursion diagnostics are not ideal because they
    usually show the atom with an uninstantiated parameter mapping, e.g
    
    concepts-recursive-sat5.C:6:41: error: satisfaction of atomic constraint 
'requires(A a, T t) {a | t;} [with T = T]' depends on itself
    
    This is a consequence of our two-level caching of atomic constraints,
    where we first cache the uninstantiated atom+args and then the
    instantiated atom+no args, and most likely the first level of caching
    detects the recursion, at which point we have no way to get a hold of
    the instantiated atom.
    
    This patch fixes this by linking the the first level of caching to the
    second level, so that we can conveniently print the instantiated atom in
    case of constraint recursion detected from the first level of caching.
    
    Alternatively we could make only the second level of caching diagnose
    constraint recursion but then we'd no longer catch constraint recursion
    that occurs during parameter mapping instantiation.  This current approach
    seems simpler, and it also seems natural to have the two cache entries
    somehow linked anyway.
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * constraint.cc (struct sat_entry): New data member inst_entry.
            (satisfaction_cache::satisfaction_cache): Initialize inst_entry.
            (satisfaction_cache::get): Use it to prefer printing the
            instantiated atom in case of constraint recursion.
            (satisfy_atom): Set inst_entry of the first cache entry to point
            to the second entry.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat2.C: Verify that the
            instantiated parameter mapping is printed.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat5.C: Likewise.
    
    Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <[email protected]>

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/constraint.cc                                 | 13 +++++++++++--
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat2.C |  3 ++-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat5.C |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
index 718982715990..4d667ced3429 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
@@ -1972,6 +1972,10 @@ struct GTY((for_user)) sat_entry
      the first time.  */
   tree result;
 
+  /* For a !ATOMIC_CONSTR_MAP_INSTANTIATED_P atom, this conveniently points to
+     the entry for the corresponding atom after instantiating its mapping.  */
+  sat_entry *inst_entry;
+
   /* The value of input_location when satisfaction of ATOM+ARGS was first
      performed.  */
   location_t location;
@@ -2131,6 +2135,7 @@ satisfaction_cache
       entry->atom = atom;
       entry->args = args;
       entry->result = NULL_TREE;
+      entry->inst_entry = nullptr;
       entry->location = input_location;
       entry->ftc_begin = entry->ftc_end = -1;
       entry->diagnose_instability = false;
@@ -2170,10 +2175,12 @@ satisfaction_cache::get ()
     {
       /* If we get here, it means satisfaction is self-recursive.  */
       gcc_checking_assert (!entry->result || seen_error ());
+      /* Prefer printing the instantiated mapping.  */
+      tree atom = entry->inst_entry ? entry->inst_entry->atom : entry->atom;
       if (info.noisy ())
-       error_at (EXPR_LOCATION (ATOMIC_CONSTR_EXPR (entry->atom)),
+       error_at (EXPR_LOCATION (ATOMIC_CONSTR_EXPR (atom)),
                  "satisfaction of atomic constraint %qE depends on itself",
-                 entry->atom);
+                 atom);
       return error_mark_node;
     }
 
@@ -2493,6 +2500,8 @@ satisfy_atom (tree t, tree args, sat_info info)
   gcc_assert (!ATOMIC_CONSTR_MAP_INSTANTIATED_P (t));
   ATOMIC_CONSTR_MAP_INSTANTIATED_P (t) = true;
   satisfaction_cache inst_cache (t, /*args=*/NULL_TREE, info);
+  if (cache.entry && inst_cache.entry)
+    cache.entry->inst_entry = inst_cache.entry;
   if (tree r = inst_cache.get ())
     {
       cache.entry->location = inst_cache.entry->location;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat2.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat2.C
index 9bc96f58979d..a264f26bc55d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat2.C
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 // { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
 
 template<typename T>
-concept Fooable = requires(T t) { foo(t); }; // { dg-error "depends on itself" 
}
+concept Fooable = requires(T t) { foo(t); };
+// { dg-error "T = test::S]' depends on itself" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
 
 template<Fooable T>
 void foo(T t) { }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat5.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat5.C
index ba564873a204..63e032494e3d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat5.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-recursive-sat5.C
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
 
 struct A { };
 
-template<typename T> concept pipeable = requires(A a, T t) { a | t; }; // { 
dg-error "depends on itself" }
+template<typename T> concept pipeable = requires(A a, T t) { a | t; };
+// { dg-error "with T = int]' depends on itself" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
 
 template<pipeable T> void operator|(A, T);

Reply via email to