https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c72ed2e711c4cb17fea8e13fa055e2f64dcdcd1
commit r16-2824-g3c72ed2e711c4cb17fea8e13fa055e2f64dcdcd1 Author: Philip Herron <herron.phi...@googlemail.com> Date: Mon May 19 17:42:17 2025 +0100 gccrs: Remove unneeded clones untill we have an arena allocator for these tmps Cloning inference variables is very expensive because it means we are indirectly creating an implicit new inference variable added to the reference chain. gcc/rust/ChangeLog: * checks/errors/privacy/rust-privacy-reporter.cc (PrivacyReporter::check_base_type_privacy): no need for unreachable here * typecheck/rust-unify.cc (UnifyRules::commit): dont clone infer vars (UnifyRules::expect_inference_variable): likewise Signed-off-by: Philip Herron <herron.phi...@googlemail.com> Diff: --- .../checks/errors/privacy/rust-privacy-reporter.cc | 3 ++- gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-unify.cc | 18 ++++++------------ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/rust/checks/errors/privacy/rust-privacy-reporter.cc b/gcc/rust/checks/errors/privacy/rust-privacy-reporter.cc index 3faa3b404e69..e1d4b167d3d8 100644 --- a/gcc/rust/checks/errors/privacy/rust-privacy-reporter.cc +++ b/gcc/rust/checks/errors/privacy/rust-privacy-reporter.cc @@ -221,8 +221,9 @@ PrivacyReporter::check_base_type_privacy (Analysis::NodeMapping &node_mappings, auto ref_id = ty->get_ref (); if (auto lookup_id = mappings.lookup_hir_to_node (ref_id)) return check_for_privacy_violation (*lookup_id, locus); - rust_unreachable (); } + break; + case TyTy::REF: return recursive_check ( static_cast<const TyTy::ReferenceType *> (ty)->get_base ()); diff --git a/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-unify.cc b/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-unify.cc index 0ffab667433c..6699f7e46b56 100644 --- a/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-unify.cc +++ b/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-unify.cc @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ UnifyRules::commit (TyTy::BaseType *base, TyTy::BaseType *other, TyTy::BaseType *resolved) { TypeCheckContext &context = *TypeCheckContext::get (); - Analysis::Mappings &mappings = Analysis::Mappings::get (); TyTy::BaseType *b = base->destructure (); TyTy::BaseType *o = other->destructure (); @@ -102,13 +101,8 @@ UnifyRules::commit (TyTy::BaseType *base, TyTy::BaseType *other, continue; // if any of the types are inference variables lets fix them - if (ref_tyty->get_kind () == TyTy::TypeKind::INFER) - { - auto node = Analysis::NodeMapping (mappings.get_current_crate (), - UNKNOWN_NODEID, ref, - UNKNOWN_LOCAL_DEFID); - context.insert_type (node, resolved->clone ()); - } + if (ref_tyty->is<TyTy::InferType> ()) + context.insert_implicit_type (ref, resolved); } } } @@ -343,7 +337,7 @@ UnifyRules::expect_inference_variable (TyTy::InferType *ltype, || r->get_infer_kind () == TyTy::InferType::InferTypeKind::GENERAL; if (is_valid) - return rtype->clone (); + return rtype; } break; @@ -354,7 +348,7 @@ UnifyRules::expect_inference_variable (TyTy::InferType *ltype, || r->get_infer_kind () == TyTy::InferType::InferTypeKind::GENERAL; if (is_valid) - return rtype->clone (); + return rtype; } break; } @@ -373,7 +367,7 @@ UnifyRules::expect_inference_variable (TyTy::InferType *ltype, if (is_valid) { ltype->apply_primitive_type_hint (*rtype); - return rtype->clone (); + return rtype; } } break; @@ -387,7 +381,7 @@ UnifyRules::expect_inference_variable (TyTy::InferType *ltype, if (is_valid) { ltype->apply_primitive_type_hint (*rtype); - return rtype->clone (); + return rtype; } } break;