https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1e616955e9971fda54a160a49e6cf70dd838a0c
commit r16-2182-ga1e616955e9971fda54a160a49e6cf70dd838a0c Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com> Date: Thu Jul 10 22:00:41 2025 +0100 aarch64: Guard VF-based costing with !m_costing_for_scalar g:4b47acfe2b626d1276e229a0cf165e934813df6c caused a segfault in aarch64_vector_costs::analyze_loop_vinfo when costing scalar code, since we'd end up dividing by a zero VF. Much of the structure of the aarch64 costing code dates from a stage 4 patch, when we had to work within the bounds of what the target-independent code did. Some of it could do with a rework now that we're not so constrained. This patch is therefore an emergency fix rather than the best long-term solution. I'll revisit when I have more time to think about it. gcc/ * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_vector_costs::add_stmt_cost): Guard VF-based costing with !m_costing_for_scalar. Diff: --- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc index 27c315fc35e8..10b8ed5d3874 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc @@ -17932,7 +17932,7 @@ aarch64_vector_costs::add_stmt_cost (int count, vect_cost_for_stmt kind, /* Do one-time initialization based on the vinfo. */ loop_vec_info loop_vinfo = dyn_cast<loop_vec_info> (m_vinfo); - if (!m_analyzed_vinfo) + if (!m_analyzed_vinfo && !m_costing_for_scalar) { if (loop_vinfo) analyze_loop_vinfo (loop_vinfo);