https://gcc.gnu.org/g:103127cd9398d140222c9da44715d447641bf791
commit r15-3209-g103127cd9398d140222c9da44715d447641bf791
Author: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de>
Date: Mon Aug 26 18:06:52 2024 +0200
Fix another inline7.c test failure on sparc targets
This new test was reported to be still failing on sparc targets.
Here the number of DW_AT_ranges dropped to zero.
The test should pass on this architecture with -Os, -O2 and -O3.
I tried to improve also different known problematic targets,
where only one subroutine had DW_AT_ranges:
Those are armhf (arm with hard float), powerpc and powerpc64.
The best option is to use -Os: So far the only one, where
all two inline instances in this test had two DW_AT_ranges.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR other/116462
* gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c: Switch to -Os optimization.
Diff:
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
index 083df5b586cd..8b2fa1210adf 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* Verify that at least one of both inline instances have
a DW_AT_ranges but no extra DW_TAG_lexical_block. */
-/* { dg-options "-O -gdwarf -dA" } */
+/* { dg-options "-Os -gdwarf -dA" } */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\(DIE \\(\[^\n\]*\\)
DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine" 2 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler " DW_AT_ranges" } } */
