------- Additional Comments From jamesp at trdlnk dot com 2005-01-24 21:19 ------- I've tried what you suggested, and it did work, but now I'm confused. Why was the constructor for aa2 called in the original example? Based on what you have said, it sounds like that should not have happened until aa2 was instantiated. If it is working properly then I don't understand why the extra line to instantiate aa2 is necessary in your fix. The fact that I specialized them all the same way and some of them were constructed and others weren't seems odd to me.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19610
