------- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-21 17:38 
-------
Digging further, there *is* a __eprintf reference in
/tmp/hptmp/obj/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so,
the one supposedly complained about when building the test-application.
Now, how did it get there?
Ah, it's in debug.o, from libstdc++-v3/src/debug.cc.
Apparently from the asserts there, likely from the gcc-2.95.2
installation? Perhaps we need to fixinclude away all __eprintf usage?
Strange that libstdc++.so could be created but not used (linked to).
Supposedly because there's another, non-hidden __eprintf somewhere?

I seem to recall a related problem discussed some time the last few
months.  I don't remember the resolution.  Maybe it was seen on darwin?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19461

Reply via email to