------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-01-18 23:52 ------- Subject: Re: bogus warning about complex "integer" types from typedef
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, stevenj at fftw dot org wrote: > Okay, I guess I see what you mean. "double" in "double _Complex" is > arguably not a "type", but rather a type-specifier as defined in 6.7.2, > and the "each list of type-specifiers shall be one of the following sets", > a prescribed list of combinations that does not include typedefs. Yes, that's my point. "double _Complex" is one valid list of type specifiers. "typedef name" is another, listed separately - a single type specifier, not part of any valid combinations. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19514
